Finally pushed through a long session today and got this one done. I’m sure there are a few highlights to do and small tweaks when I look at it tomorrow, but happy with the final work. I’m sure I’ll look back on this in the future and laugh at the quality, but for today, it’s a good start.
Since the last session, the roses were touched up (yes, again), leaves were finished, stems done, and the ever intimidating glass vase wrestled to the painterly mat.
Woohoo! Time for wine.
Managed to work in another short session tonight, a Tuesday! Good progress on details and some changes. Really getting the hang of some of the subtleties within individual petals. Might take a whack at the vase later this week b/c I’m pretty happy – finally – with the roses themselves.
Thought I was getting close last time I posted, but decided to rework some of the palette after some guidance from one of my art instructors. Learning patience with this, but now I’m to the point where it’s enjoyable every session because it keeps moving in the right direction. No more predictions as to when it will be done, but rest assured it won’t take this long next time! Progress photo below, although may need to update the picture in this post b/c the lighting looks off. Granted, I moved the palette to more orange and yellow, but it’s not this saturated.
More progress, albeit slow, on the white roses. Used more value contrast, incorporating raw umber, ultramarine blue, and darker and lighter variations of yellows. This updated photo reflects more progress on the rose in the center bottom, center top (in profile), and far left lower.
The plan (perhaps I should call it ambition) is to finish this project over the weekend, forcing myself to not get lost in the details. Mentioning it on this post to embarrass myself if I don’t get it done.
Breaking down what really needs to be done:
Stay tuned… getting close on this one.
Spent a couple more hours on the roses today. Progress can be subtle, which is what happened today. I had been working towards variations of yellow, but realized the right color was closer to orange. Still having trouble figuring out the right technique to get realistic rose petals, but the practice has been moving things along. I’m happy with the palette, though, so the painting will at least look good from a distance no matter how the detail work progresses. Ha!
Next session will focus on adding more petals, the vase, and updates to the roses in the middle back row.
New quick project before the return to Giverny wipe-out. Haven’t painted roses before, so it could get ugly, but so far so good. Inspirational roses,
Started with a quick sketch of the main rose focal point, which came surprisingly fast. Guess the sketching lessons/practice are helping.
Next step, basic turpsy sketch on the panel. Again, got lucky on first try and it’s ready for some paint.
About an hour later the first layer was down. Decent start, but looking at this as the basic layer from which to build.
Ding dong the witch is dead, the wicked wicked reflection witch is dead! Sorta.
Remember, this is a practice session on painting paper, so was just looking to get the hang of a basic (read: decent) reflection in a relatively still pond. Pretty happy with how this came out. Spent an hour of actual painting on this tonight (which brings the total effort to about 3 hours), but remixing the paints was fast b/c I actually made notes from the first session so I could recreate without much effort.
Focused on darker values for most everything in the reflection, which seems to have worked out really well. Initially, I had taken it too far to the dark side, which I noticed once I started on the sienna walls, which were so dark there wasn’t going to be any chance I could get the doors and windows to show up very well in the reflection, even if I had used tube black. The solution was to work some white back into the paint on the “canvas” while everything was still wet – all praise oil paints!
Below is the zoom in view of the reflection area. In addition to the darker values, the lines are also softened so things are more fuzzy. Then I took a dry round #4 brush and pulled some paint from one area into it’s neighbor, i.e. start the brush in the green of the bushes, drag it lightly across the green and into the sienna of the building to give the appearance of a ripple in the water. Next was introducing some of the blue sky into the water, which was simply done with a lightened blue (with white) stroked in random areas of the pool; used a smaller, stiff brush, #2 flat. All the large block sections were also painted with long, broad horizontal strokes. It’s amazing to me how well horizontal strokes can make a surface look like water. The final step was to soften the entire water area by making long horizontal strokes across large sections with a very soft, very wide, very cheap 2″ wide flat brush.
I was genuinely surprised at the effectiveness of the last step with the cheap big brush. I also avoided doing any vertical brush strokes down the reflection area, which simply wasn’t necessary with this type of pond. Might need that for a larger lake landscape, to elongate and distort tree reflections in the water, but for this highly reflective, still water pond, it would have detracted from the composition. This is where things started to fall apart with the Giverny wipeout which was exacerbated by the use of too much paint.
Calling this good and the practice session finished. I’ve now sketched this scene a couple times and painted it once, so I think I will tackle an actual full size painting of this for my next project before attempting Giverny again. I’ll need to distort reality a little bit, though, b/c the composition with the palm tree in the center of the frame is boring. But there are nice curved lines from the palm fronds, and some awesome diagonal lines from both the building and the hedgerow bushes that it could prove to be a very well structured painting that draws the viewer in and through the space. Stay tuned…
Finished licking my Giverny wounds, did more research, watched some vids, and got back on the art horse tonight.
Decided to do a few practice works on paper before tackling Giverny again, or any other water reflections for that matter. Spent a couple hours on this to get it teed up for another attempt at the water reflections. Not really worried about details or the exactness of the composition, but I am paying particular attention to the color palette and values, in large part b/c those components can be integral to creating good water reflections. My plan is to tackle the reflections during my next session, which should largely wrap up this practice piece, but we’ll see how that goes.
BTW, this is a picture I took while in Granada, Spain, visiting the Alhambra – this is an amazing place! Breathtaking!
Here is the reference photo.
Well, I shouldn’t have called the painting gods “persnickety” in my last post. In my effort to paint the reflections of the trees into the pond, the painting lemmings swept me over the cliff of inexperience. I knew things were going to be tricky since I’d made the mistake of laying in the lily pads before the water reflections, but figured I could dance around them and do some touchups afterwards. WRONG!
My assessment of the causes of the Giverny Disaster of 2014 is as follows:
1. Arrogance or ignorance, or in this case, both! Not sure what I was thinking not doing a few practice sessions with water reflections prior to trying my maiden attempt on an actual working painting.
2. I knew what to do in principle, had seen demos, and it seemed pretty straight forward. However, the actual execution has nuances that only practice can reveal.
3. Pretty sure I used paint that was too thick. I’ve read post-wipeout that water reflections should be done with a thin layer of paint. Not sure if that’s true, but thick clearly didn’t work for me, so sounds right about now.
4. Used the wrong type of brush to do the vertical and horizontal dry-wipes that would give the reflected images that shimmer.
5. Even if the technique had been sound, and I had figured out how to deftly get around the prematurely painted lily pads, I had the colors of the reflection images wrong (pretty close though), in large part because I did them in completely separate painting sessions from when I painted the actual trees on the bank of the pond. Not a big deal, but I think it’s something I should remember for next time.
6. Panicked! Rule #1 of painting, at least for me, is don’t panic. Its supposed to be relaxing as the creative juices flow, but when I ran into this problem, instead of just walking away and coming back another day, I started guessing and made hasty decisions.
In the end, I wiped the disaster with a paper towel and spread the remaining paint around the canvas. While it can’t be “saved”, I’m pretty sure I can come back to this wipeout in the future and get it right. Gonna chalk this up as one of those steeps in the learning curve, and a clear indicator that my best painting is done with wine in hand. Cheers!
Been sketching the past couple of days, but nothing worth posting. Spent a short session on Giverny a couple days ago, working in the bridge and finished the first pass at the lily pads. I’m happy with the bridge itself – proportion, hue are solid – but the reflection in the water is a total fail. For a closer look at the water reflection fail, see the zoom-in view below.
Good news is I’m fairly confident it can be fixed. The canvas soaked in the very light layer of paint I tried to use in the reflection, so I wasn’t able to get the right look when I tried to incorporate the water shimmer effects using a dry brush. There simply wasn’t enough wet paint on the surface to manipulate. Another slap-me-in-the-face lesson from the persnickety painting gods.
Art Bern 